Ben Jones vs Ewen Lumsden Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent form, Jones has a slight edge on their second serve with a 45.39% win rate compared to Lumsden's 43.87%.
• Looking at return game statistics, Lumsden has been more effective, winning 48.14% of points on their opponent's second serve, whereas Jones has managed 38.7%.
• When it comes to returning first serves, Lumsden again outperforms Jones, winning 31.09% against Jones's 22.05%.
• Under pressure, Jones has a better breakpoint save rate at 54.84% compared to Lumsden's 50.77%.
• Over the last year, Lumsden is ahead in match wins, securing 59.68% victories compared to Jones's 46%.
• Considering the surface, Jones favors indoor hard courts with a 52% win rate, while Lumsden excels on clay with a 65% win rate.
• In lower-tier tournaments ($10K), Lumsden has a higher win percentage of 61.67% compared to Jones's 47.5%.
• Jones has the advantage in their direct head-to-head history, having won their only match against Lumsden.
• Their previous encounter's match duration averaged 2 hours and 34 minutes, emphasizing competitive play.
• Deciding set statistics favor Jones, who has secured 56% of such sets over the past year, against Lumsden's 50%.
• Break point conversion is another area where Lumsden shines, converting 39.81% of opportunities, notably higher than Jones's 17.65%.
• Against tougher competition—based on average opponent rank—Lumsden has faced slightly stronger opponents compared to Jones.

Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):

Jones and Lumsden demonstrate varied strengths, making this head-to-head match an intriguing contest. Jones leverages their skills in high-pressure situations, with a notable edge in saving breakpoints and converting deciding sets. However, their lower win rate and breakpoint conversion remain potential vulnerabilities against Lumsden.

Lumsden's stronger overall win record and superior return game indicate resilience and capability in counterattacking, especially on surfaces like clay where they excel. Despite their past loss to Jones, this experience might fuel their motivation for exploring and adjusting strategies.

Although Jones has historically succeeded in direct encounters and showcases solid pressure management, Lumsden's recent form and varied return abilities suggest a slight edge in current competitiveness.

Considered individually and collectively, these factors position Lumsden as the more likely victor in this upcoming match, unless Jones capitalizes on their return to form and tactical changes.